Connect with us

General

Expect More DNA Data Breaches Like MyHeritage

You can change your passwords, you can change your financial details. But you can’t change your DNA (not yet, at least).

Which is why this week’s revelation about the hack of DNA testing kit provider MyHeritage is so alarming.

On Monday, the company reported that email addresses and hashed passwords of more than 92 million user accounts were stolen in an October breach.

“There has been no evidence that the data in the file was ever used by the perpetrators,” a MyHeritage blog post said. “Since Oct. 26, 2017 (the date of the breach) … we have not seen any activity indicating that any MyHeritage accounts had been compromised.”

Credit card and other sensitive information, like family trees and DNA data, is stored separately, and not believed to have been exposed.

Still, this violation should raise red flags among vendors and consumers: As at-home genetic testing becomes more popular, folks can expect more hacks like this one.

But why would anyone want to steal someone else’s DNA?

To sell it back for a ransom, according to Giovanni Vigna, a professor of computer science at UC Santa Barbara and co-founder of cybersecurity firm Lastline.

Hospitals in the US and UK have fallen victim to just such a scam, paying thousands of dollars to reclaim encrypted patient files.

Genetic info, though—specifically easily accessible health interpretations—could prove even more cost-effective.

“This data could be sold on the down-low or monetized to insurance companies,” Vigna told The Verge. “You can imagine the consequences: One day, I might apply for a long-term loan and get rejected because deep in the corporate system, there is data that I am very likely to get Alzheimer’s and die before I would repay the loan.”

Chilling.

There are plenty of people—researchers, insurance companies, law enforcement—who could benefit from stockpiles of DNA data. And there are plenty of people willing to auction it to the highest bidder.

Eventually, The Verge warned, genetic data may become so commonplace that folks can download someone’s stats for a fee, much like we do now with criminal records.

“I can’t imagine that, once this information is hacked and put on the Web, it would have more protection than before,” University of Baltimore law professor Natalie Ram told the tech blog. “I don’t think we can say that simply because some data was the result of a hack, no one is ever going to touch it. That would be unrealistic.”

It’s bad enough that genetic data is easily misinterpreted by the untrained eye. But add to that the fact that direct-to-consumer kits often result in false positives, and this sounds like another sign of the apocalypse.

[embedded content]

For more on DNA testing visit our sister site PCMag for their complete round-up and recommendations.

Let us know what you like about Geek by taking our survey.

SOURCE

General

Mobile App Extends Smartphone Battery 10-25 Percent

Forget world peace and global warming: Researchers have finally found a way to extend the life of smartphone batteries by up to an hour each day.

A team at the University of Waterloo in Canada developed a mobile app that reduces devices’ energy consumption without any significant impact on performance.

But iOS users will have to stick to bulky battery packs and tangled charging cables. According to a study published by the journal IEEE Access, the program is currently aimed only at Android handsets.

Split-view—the most prominent feature in Android Nougat 7.0—allows folks to run multiple windows and files at the same time, as on a desktop or laptop computer.

“This results in unnecessary energy drain,” co-author Kshirasagar Naik, a Waterloo professor of electrical and computer engineering, said in a statement.

“We have developed an app which users can install on their devices and use to reduce the brightness of non-critical applications,” he continued. “So, when you’re interacting with one application, the brightness of the other window goes down, thereby [reducing] the energy consumption on the device.”

In an experiment involving 200 smartphone users, the energy-saving technique extended battery life by 10 to 25 percent.

And while that might not sound like much, anyone who has ever watched their screen go black mid-social media update or lost a call to a dead battery will appreciate that extra boost—which could mean the difference between arriving at your Google Maps destination and getting lost in the dark.

“What happens now is that you put the phone on a charger for the night and when you leave home the next day the battery is at 100 percent, but there is a lot of behind-the-scenes computation and communication going on, and it drains the battery,” Naik explained.

“By midday, charge is reduced to 30 percent, and from the user’s perspective, that is a big pain,” he said. “Due to excess energy consumption, the phone becomes warmer and warmer while the frequent charging reduces the life of the battery. So, batteries that are meant to last for three years may have to be replaced in two years.”

Hey, we’ve all been there. Here’s to hoping this app hits digital stores soon.

Improvements are being made with cell batteries every day. The Samsung Galaxy 9 is apart of that. Read our full hands-on review of the new phone here.

[embedded content]

SOURCE

Continue Reading

General

AI KOs Pro DotA 2 Players in Live Tournament

In another win for artificial intelligence, AI bots successfully defeated a group of professional Defense of the Ancients (DotA) 2 players.

The multiplayer online battle arena mod pits two teams against each other in an attempt to destroy their opponent’s home base, known as an Ancient.

And that’s exactly what OpenAI Five—a set of five cooperative machine learning systems—did during a recent tournament.

The day began with a warm-up: audience volunteers playing the first public match against Five, which won in 14 minutes (an evenly matched game generally takes 45 minutes).

Once limbered up, the AI unit took on—and wiped the floor with—five North American pros: William “Blitz” Lee, Austin “Capitalist” Walsh, Ioannis “Fogged” Loucas, Ben “Merlini” Wu, and David “MoonMeander” Tan.

[embedded content]

Boasting a new ability to draft heroes, OpenAI Five won the first game in only 21 minutes and 37 seconds, and the second in fewer than 25 minutes.

This victory “is a step towards advanced AI systems which can handle the complexity and uncertainty of the real world,” OpenAI wrote in a blog announcement.

For the third match, the non-profit relinquished its greatest skill, instead of allowing audience members to select Five’s characters, putting the machine at a severe disadvantage. It ultimately lost to the humans after 35 minutes and 47 seconds.

“These results,” according to the blog, “give us confidence in moving to the next phase of this project: playing a team of professionals at The International,” held in Vancouver from Aug. 20-25.

Keep an eye on social media for additional game details

But OpenAI Five has dreams greater than DotA 2.

“Ultimately, we will measure the success of our DotA system in its application to real-world tasks,” the firm said.

Founded in 2015 by Elon Musk and Sam Altman, OpenAI aims to promote and develop friendly AI; it also collaborates with other institutions and researchers by making patents and research open to the public.

For all the latest in eSports news head over to our section here.

Let us know what you like about Geek by taking our survey.

SOURCE

Continue Reading

General

Students Build Shoelace-Tying Robot for $600

Over, under, around, and through: Students at the University of California, Davis, engineered a robot capable of tying a shoe.

And it cost far less than any state-of-the-art android.

“This machine,” according to a video published by team member Andrew Choi, “was designed and manufactured with the limitations of only being able to use two motors and a $600 budget.”

Neither compact nor speedy, the device, which uses the Ian Knot (“world’s fastest,” according to its creator), is certainly not going to be part of IKEA’s winter catalogue.

And while DARPA could probably build something faster and sleeker—that also climbs stairs and pulls people from burning wreckage—this contraption is clever, innovative, and, perhaps most importantly: cheap.

[embedded content]

(It remains unclear, however, whether the machine actually works with a foot placed inside the shoe.)

Initially reported on Reddit—posted by UC Davis lecturer Jason Moore (moorepants)—the shoe-tying robot has received a lot of attention since its construction for an annual design competition with Meijo University in Japan.

“We, the professors, come up with machine design challenges,” Moore explained in a statement to Geek. “Student groups in Meijo and UCD work on the machines for about five months independently, and then they come together in Davis to compete.

“The challenges are designed to test the students’ ingenuity, let them make use of their new engineering skills, and to help them learn some about how culture affects machine design,” he continued. “This group did excellent work. It is the only fully functioning shoe typing machine we’ve been able to find on the Internet.”

If this is what a group of five novice engineers can do with $600 and two motors, imagine the possibilities given more money and equipment.

The team includes Choi, Gabriela Gomes, Jacklyn Tran, Stephanie Thai, and Joel Humes.

UC Davis has a history of interesting robots: Biologist Gail Patricelli, of the Department of Evolution and Ecology, recently developed robotic fowl, capable of flirting its way into the hearts of male sage-grouses. The study aimed to learn courtship tactics and analyze coupling decisions.

Editor’s note: This article was updated at 11:50 a.m. ET with comment from Jason Moore.

[embedded content]

Let us know what you like about Geek by taking our survey.

SOURCE

Continue Reading

Deals

Trending